Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis · public research digest

ALS Research Watch

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also called motor neuron disease (MND), damages the nerve cells that control muscles. This site summarises published research in plain language, with every finding linked to its source and labelled by the strength of its evidence.

Last research check: .

Latest research

Newest first. Each summary is reviewed by an editor before it appears.

Biomarkers Peer-reviewed

A clinical risk score does not replace neurofilament testing for sorting trial participants

Published
Added here

ALS progresses at very different speeds, which makes trials hard to read. Two ways of accounting for this are a clinical risk score built from symptoms and history (the TRICALS score) and a protein measured in spinal fluid that rises with nerve damage (phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain, pNfH).

Source: Al Khleifat A, Malaspina A, Kirby J, et al. Journal of Neurology, 2026.

Read the summary: A clinical risk score does not replace neurofilament testing for sorting trial participants · Read the original research (opens in a new tab)

Prognosis Peer-reviewed

Flail-arm survival advantage tracks the type of nerve damage, not the arm itself

Published
Added here

People whose ALS starts in the upper arms, including the flail-arm pattern, have often been reported to live longer than average. This Italian register study asked why.

Source: Calvo A, Moglia C, Callegaro S, et al. Journal of Neurology, 2026.

Read the summary: Flail-arm survival advantage tracks the type of nerve damage, not the arm itself · Read the original research (opens in a new tab)

Care Peer-reviewed

Vienna clinic reports longer survival after switching to specialised ALS care

Published
Added here

In 2018 the neurology department of the Medical University of Vienna opened a dedicated ALS outpatient clinic. This study compared 242 people treated before and after that change.

Source: Keritam O, Bormann D, Haimberger F, et al. Neurological Research and Practice, 2026.

Read the summary: Vienna clinic reports longer survival after switching to specialised ALS care · Read the original research (opens in a new tab)

Diagnosis Peer-reviewed

Pooled data confirm the Gold Coast criteria catch more ALS cases, with less certain specificity

Published
Added here

The Gold Coast criteria, proposed in 2020, simplified how neurologists confirm an ALS diagnosis. This analysis pooled the individual records of 3,007 people from five international studies to compare them with the older revised El Escorial and Awaji criteria.

Source: Shrestha N, Munn Z, Calma A, et al. Journal of Neurology, 2026.

Read the summary: Pooled data confirm the Gold Coast criteria catch more ALS cases, with less certain specificity · Read the original research (opens in a new tab)

Genetics Peer-reviewed

Genetic FTD study: motor symptoms, not the gene itself, shape survival

Published
Added here

The GENFI consortium followed 278 people with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) caused by a change in one of three genes: C9orf72, GRN or MAPT. The C9orf72 repeat expansion is also the most common known genetic cause of ALS, and 31 participants had both FTD and ALS.

Source: Bouzigues A, Grassi M, Cantoni V, et al.; GENFI consortium The Lancet Neurology, 2026.

Read the summary: Genetic FTD study: motor symptoms, not the gene itself, shape survival · Read the original research (opens in a new tab)

Disease mechanism Peer-reviewed

Mouse study points to repeat proteins as the main harm in C9orf72 ALS

Published
Added here

The C9orf72 expansion produces two possibly harmful things: repeat RNA, and short repeat proteins (dipeptide repeat proteins) made from that RNA. Researchers have long asked which of the two drives the disease.

Source: Jiang X, Schaeffer L, Patni D, et al. Science, 2026.

Read the summary: Mouse study points to repeat proteins as the main harm in C9orf72 ALS · Read the original research (opens in a new tab)

Clinical trial Peer-reviewed

Low-dose interleukin-2 missed its main survival goal; a biomarker subgroup did better

Published
Added here

MIROCALS tested whether low doses of interleukin-2, a drug that boosts regulatory immune cells, could improve survival when added to riluzole. 220 people were randomly assigned to the drug or a placebo for 18 months.

Source: Bensimon G, Leigh PN, Tree T, et al.; MIROCALS Study Group The Lancet, 2025.

Read the summary: Low-dose interleukin-2 missed its main survival goal; a biomarker subgroup did better · Read the original research (opens in a new tab)